User talk:Hipocrite

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hipocrite is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

Archive 1 12/2008 01/2009 02/2009 Editnotice 03/2009 04/2009 05/2009 06/2009 07/2009 09/2009 10/2009 11/2009 12/2009 cfwar 01/2010 02/2010 Archives

[edit] Template GalvanicCells

I was wondering if you could go to Template talk:GalvanicCells and explain to the IP why you are reverting their changes to the template. They asked for a third opinion, but I said no because the two editors involved are not talking. So if you could explain I think it would be most helpful. Thanks ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 20:28, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

The IP is banned. I will not interact with a banned user. They are well aware of this. Hipocrite (talk) 20:28, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I did not know that, thanks for the response. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 20:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] 99.34.77.217

What's going on with IP editor 99.34.77.217? --Bejnar (talk) 20:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Banned user Nrcprm2026 is not permitted to contribute. Hipocrite (talk) 20:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Bybee memo

Hi Hipocrite. I am trying to clean up and improve the Bybee memo page, before moving it to another more appropriate name which would be "Torture Memos" (for reasons I stated there on the discussion page). You'd tagged a section and asked that the tag not be removed until its discussed. What I propose doing is moving that problematic section down into the critique of the memos. It will follow a short and simple chronology of their birth at OLC, their short life, and their death by President Obama's Executive Order. I will then start an introductory sentence "Opponents of the so-called 'enhanced interrogation' say . . . . " That way the list of everybody saying its torture is no longer an assertion of fact, merely a balanced recounting of one perspective. Could you quote this and put any comments on the Bybee Memo page? Thanks, ElijahBosley (talk) 20:11, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

If your back from your break I would make a request of you. Remember my last article, Criticism of the IPCC. You tore it to bits, and stomped it into the ground, O the humanity :), so I would like for you, if you have time to look at my current wip [1] and let me know what you think of it. Thanks. mark nutley (talk) 14:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

I think that I don't care about climate change on Wikipedia except to state that it's the third rail. Touch it and you die. Hipocrite (talk) 14:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

But, without reading it, let me state that what you could do to fix it is imagine that you were absolutly positive that climate change was happening, and it was caused by humans. Then write the article to reflect that. Then find a middle ground between what you know I think is right and what you wish were right, and propose that. Hipocrite (talk) 14:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Ok mate, thanks for the advice mark nutley (talk) 14:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

[edit] I don't understand your meaning

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Climate change denial (4th nomination) you wrote: You feel there's no topic that could be written neutrally about? I can't make out your meaning, and I think others might have the same problem. Could you rewrite that or explain it? Thanks. -- JohnWBarber (talk) 01:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Inflation

Please see my statement about Cost-of-living allowances (that you reverted) on the Inflation Discussion page. Thank you.

PennySeven (talk) 11:24, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop your personal attack against me.

Please stop your personal attack against me as you did on the Inflation discussion page.

This is a warning. When I have the time I will report your personal attack in the proper way. This is a warning. I don´t know how to give you that warning statement.

PennySeven (talk) 14:06, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Wait, is this a warning? Tan | 39 14:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Unsure, however looking at the same warning being given on the inflation talk page i don`t actually see a personal attack? Strange indeed :) mark nutley (talk) 14:16, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

That's far enough of that crap. Tan | 39 22:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I beg your pardon? mark nutley (talk) 22:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Referring to PennySeven. Tan | 39 22:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)g

O` ok, i got a tad confused then :) mark nutley (talk) 23:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC)